<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cycling Nutrition 101: Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/</link>
	<description>Cycling News, Gear, Nutrition and More...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davie</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-77772</link>
		<dc:creator>Davie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/#comment-77772</guid>
		<description>Without going to deep into the process...you need 1 gram of protein per pound to maintain muscle and 1.5 grams per pound of body weight to gain muscle. By not taking in enough protein each day to maintain your body will literally start to eat its own protein to survive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without going to deep into the process&#8230;you need 1 gram of protein per pound to maintain muscle and 1.5 grams per pound of body weight to gain muscle. By not taking in enough protein each day to maintain your body will literally start to eat its own protein to survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-64297</link>
		<dc:creator>Jsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/#comment-64297</guid>
		<description>The calculation should be using weight in kilograms, not pounds - Mathamagician (fantastic handle btw) is correct. I did my undergraduate degree in dietetics and am currently getting my Ph.D. in nutritional sciences. The American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada and the American College of Sports Medicine released a joint position paper on nutrition and athletic performance this year (2011): (http://www.eatright.org/WorkArea//DownloadAsset.aspx?id=8435).

Their recommendation for athletes is 1.2-1.7 g/kg. Comparatively, 0.8 g/kg is often the reference taught in nutrition/dietetics curricula for normal adults. It actually is not very feasible to maintain an intake of 140 g protein/day for a 70 kg adult, since other macronutrient intakes may be undesirably altered (potentially, too few carbs and too much fat, depending on the diet). Excess protein would just end up being excreted in the urine as urea anyway, although extremely high intakes (probably over 2.5 g/kg) may cause kidney damage.

Also, just a note, your &quot;Training Athlete&quot; (0.6-0.9) and &quot;Adult Building Muscle Mass&quot; (0.6-0.9) categories have the same intake levels listed. I would say the former category should probably be around 0.8-1.2, while the latter (we&#039;re talking about serious anaerobic lifting here, more like bodybuilding or powerlifting) would be in the 1.2-1.7 range. 

I&#039;m an avid cyclist and with both my cyclist and dietetics hats on see no reason for most cyclists to be consuming more than 1.2 g/kg. Cycling is certainly anaerobic at times, but not nearly enough to require much more dietary protein than that. The fiber damage and repair needs in a cyclist&#039;s legs are simply not on the same level as in a bodybuilder or the like - they&#039;re two separate physiological responses. 

Finally, the link I have included has a lot of high-quality information on performance nutrition in topics other than protein needs. I recommend a full reading.

Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The calculation should be using weight in kilograms, not pounds &#8211; Mathamagician (fantastic handle btw) is correct. I did my undergraduate degree in dietetics and am currently getting my Ph.D. in nutritional sciences. The American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada and the American College of Sports Medicine released a joint position paper on nutrition and athletic performance this year (2011): (<a href="http://www.eatright.org/WorkArea//DownloadAsset.aspx?id=8435" rel="nofollow">http://www.eatright.org/WorkArea//DownloadAsset.aspx?id=8435</a>).</p>
<p>Their recommendation for athletes is 1.2-1.7 g/kg. Comparatively, 0.8 g/kg is often the reference taught in nutrition/dietetics curricula for normal adults. It actually is not very feasible to maintain an intake of 140 g protein/day for a 70 kg adult, since other macronutrient intakes may be undesirably altered (potentially, too few carbs and too much fat, depending on the diet). Excess protein would just end up being excreted in the urine as urea anyway, although extremely high intakes (probably over 2.5 g/kg) may cause kidney damage.</p>
<p>Also, just a note, your &#8220;Training Athlete&#8221; (0.6-0.9) and &#8220;Adult Building Muscle Mass&#8221; (0.6-0.9) categories have the same intake levels listed. I would say the former category should probably be around 0.8-1.2, while the latter (we&#8217;re talking about serious anaerobic lifting here, more like bodybuilding or powerlifting) would be in the 1.2-1.7 range. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m an avid cyclist and with both my cyclist and dietetics hats on see no reason for most cyclists to be consuming more than 1.2 g/kg. Cycling is certainly anaerobic at times, but not nearly enough to require much more dietary protein than that. The fiber damage and repair needs in a cyclist&#8217;s legs are simply not on the same level as in a bodybuilder or the like &#8211; they&#8217;re two separate physiological responses. </p>
<p>Finally, the link I have included has a lot of high-quality information on performance nutrition in topics other than protein needs. I recommend a full reading.</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathamagician</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-13319</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathamagician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/#comment-13319</guid>
		<description>Is your calculation for protein correct? Going by your example, if you take your weight and mutiply by any of those conversion factors you would get varying results based on if you used Pounds or Kgs as the unit. So according to your example of 0.9 x 160, you get 144 grams of protein. Assuming this is pounds, the kg conversion is around 72.5kg or around 65grams of protein. This is much more realistic than 144 grams. I can&#039;t understand how you can swap between pounds and grams, one is imperial and the other is metric. Totaly smashes your creditablity bro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your calculation for protein correct? Going by your example, if you take your weight and mutiply by any of those conversion factors you would get varying results based on if you used Pounds or Kgs as the unit. So according to your example of 0.9 x 160, you get 144 grams of protein. Assuming this is pounds, the kg conversion is around 72.5kg or around 65grams of protein. This is much more realistic than 144 grams. I can&#8217;t understand how you can swap between pounds and grams, one is imperial and the other is metric. Totaly smashes your creditablity bro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cycling Nutrition 101: Part 4 - RoadCycler.com</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-8439</link>
		<dc:creator>Cycling Nutrition 101: Part 4 - RoadCycler.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cycling-nutrition-101-part-3/#comment-8439</guid>
		<description>[...] parts 1, 2, and 3 of Cycling Nutrition 101, we dug into the main components of not only cycling nutrition, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] parts 1, 2, and 3 of Cycling Nutrition 101, we dug into the main components of not only cycling nutrition, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

