Comments on: Trek 1.5 Review (2008) http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/05/2008-trek-15-review/ Cycling News, Gear, Nutrition and More... Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:00:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Christian http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/05/2008-trek-15-review/comment-page-1/#comment-24340 Christian Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:48:21 +0000 http://www.roadcycler.com/?p=225#comment-24340 Hi, Thanks for the review. I learn a great deal from your reviews. I recently purchased the 2009 Trek 1.5 and immediately upgraded the front derailleur to Tiagra and the rear to Ultegra, and the crank was changed to a Bontrager Select compact double. With those changes in place, is this now close in value to the Trek 2.1 or 2.3? Thanks, -Christian Hi,

Thanks for the review. I learn a great deal from your reviews.

I recently purchased the 2009 Trek 1.5 and immediately upgraded the front derailleur to Tiagra and the rear to Ultegra, and the crank was changed to a Bontrager Select compact double. With those changes in place, is this now close in value to the Trek 2.1 or 2.3?

Thanks,

-Christian

]]> By: Trek 2.1 Review (2008) - RoadCycler.com http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/05/2008-trek-15-review/comment-page-1/#comment-10531 Trek 2.1 Review (2008) - RoadCycler.com Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:06:03 +0000 http://www.roadcycler.com/?p=225#comment-10531 [...] the 2008 Trek 2.1 would win over a lot of cyclists.  The paint design looks a bit familiar with another bike we’ve reviewed, and trying to compare looks of the 1.5 with the 2.1 won’t draw too many [...] [...] the 2008 Trek 2.1 would win over a lot of cyclists.  The paint design looks a bit familiar with another bike we’ve reviewed, and trying to compare looks of the 1.5 with the 2.1 won’t draw too many [...]

]]>