<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RoadCycler.com &#187; Bike Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roadcycler.com/category/bike-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roadcycler.com</link>
	<description>Cycling News, Gear, Nutrition and More...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Felt F3SL road bike review at Bikesport</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/08/2009-felt-f3sl-road-bike-review-at-bikesport/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/08/2009-felt-f3sl-road-bike-review-at-bikesport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F3SL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>f3sl</category>
	<category>steeper</category>
	<category>written</category>
	<category>felt</category>
	<category>refinement</category>
	<category>fuselage</category>
	<category>longish</category>
	<category>angles</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the article may not be the most neutral review of a bike I have ever read (as it was written by &#8220;Michigan&#8217;s largest triathlon and bike store&#8221;), there is still some very good information.  We were once again asleep when this article came out, because while it doesn&#8217;t have a post date, it was clearly written before The Tour.
The first thing I thought when riding the F3SL was how nice the frame is. I own a road bike over twice the price of the F3SL- with exactly the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/08/2009-felt-f3sl-road-bike-review-at-bikesport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wired Magazine Reviews Cyclo-Cross Bikes</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/07/wired-magazine-reviews-cyclo-cross-bikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/07/wired-magazine-reviews-cyclo-cross-bikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannondale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired Magazine]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category></category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wired Magazine has gotten their hands on a decent variety of cyclo-cross bikes.  They review the high end Moots PsychloX, the Cannondale XTJ, the Specialized Tricross S-Works, and the Redline Conquest Pro.  And the winner is&#8230;the Moots PsychloX.  Of course, starting at $6000, you had better start saving.  From the article:
This titanium beauty backs up its looks with grace as the best-handling cyclo on all terrains. At 17.4 pounds, it&#8217;s very light, but the bottom bracket — where the pedal cranks fit through the frame — is stiff enough to ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/07/wired-magazine-reviews-cyclo-cross-bikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trek 2.1 Review (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/06/trek-21-review-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/06/trek-21-review-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trek]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category></category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 Trek 2.1 is a fast, and comfortable bike on a dependable, and stiff frame.  The 2.1 model has been renamed this year, from the former and popular Trek 2100 model (the majority of the Trek line has been renamed).
Make sure to read some of our other bike reviews, mostly to check out the comparable components, visual styles, and pricing, to see which bikes you should test drive at your local bike shop.  There are a lot of similarly priced bikes in the Trek 2.1 price range, and I ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/06/trek-21-review-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trek 1.5 Review (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/05/2008-trek-15-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/05/2008-trek-15-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category></category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 Trek 1.5 is formerly known as the Trek 1500.  As mentioned in the Trek 1.2 review, Trek has updated, and reorganized many of their model numbers in 2008 from the thousand (1500 last year) series, to the x.x series (1.5 this year).
Once again, Trek doesn&#8217;t disappoint as the Trek 1.5 is a decent value, with a stiff, and light frame.  The components have seen some significant changes, but as you&#8217;ll see, not all of them are for the better this year.

Visuals
The Trek 1.5 is actually quite ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/05/2008-trek-15-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Specialized Allez Triple Review (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/03/specialized-allez-triple-review-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/03/specialized-allez-triple-review-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>allez</category>
	<category>specialized</category>
	<category>brings</category>
	<category>2008</category>
	<category>company</category>
	<category>model</category>
	<category>bicycle</category>
	<category>line</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/03/specialized-allez-triple-review-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Specialized has pulled out all the stops with the latest in the line of Allez models for 2008.  The Allez Triple really brings a lot to the table for an entry-level bike, as the components are quite upgraded (new 9-speed Sora for one&#8230;) on a pretty good frame.  I didn&#8217;t expect it to be the miracle bike, but there were some surprising components for a low price of $800.

Visuals
The black and silver model of the Allez looks really great.  It&#8217;s very clean, simple, and looks fast.  ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/03/specialized-allez-triple-review-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schwinn Fastback Sport Review (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/03/schwinn-fastback-sport-review-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/03/schwinn-fastback-sport-review-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 03:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under $700 Bikes]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>schwinn</category>
	<category>cadillac</category>
	<category>bicycles</category>
	<category>american</category>
	<category>bikes</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/03/schwinn-fastback-sport-review-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 Fastback Sport is the latest entry-level road bike from Schwinn Bikes.  Schwinn has been around for over 110 years, so they&#8217;re definitely not new to the road bike (the company has changed a lot over the years, an d not always for good&#8230;). They haven&#8217;t been known to be on the cutting edge, and with this bike it isn&#8217;t any different, but what the Fastback Sport does offer is a pretty solid entry level bike.
 The majority of lower-cost road bikes primarily differentiate from each other by ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/03/schwinn-fastback-sport-review-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trek 1.2 Review (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/02/trek-12-review-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/02/trek-12-review-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under $700 Bikes]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>bontrager</category>
	<category>2203</category>
	<category>select</category>
	<category>alloy</category>
	<category>8mm</category>
	<category>trek</category>
	<category>trek</category>
	<category>wheels</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/02/trek-12-review-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 Trek 1.2 is the latest in Trek&#8217;s entry level road bikes.  It&#8217;s a very affordable bike that falls below the $750 price category, and for many, it&#8217;s the first step to the world of high-performance road cycling. Trek has updated many of their model numbers in 2008 from the thousand (1000 last year) series, to the x.x series (1.2 this year). This model number change is not just cosmetic, as it does introduce a few key differences with the previous years Trek 1000.

Visuals
The most notable difference this ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2008/02/trek-12-review-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trek 1500 Review (2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2007/09/trek-1500-review-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2007/09/trek-1500-review-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trek-1500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trek-1500-review]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>trek</category>
	<category>1500</category>
	<category>review</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2007/09/trek-1500-review-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Trek 1500 is probably one of the more popular cycles currently around, and at a fair (if not slightly high) price from $950 &#8211; $1,100, is attainable for any avid road cycler.
Let&#8217;s start with the specifications of the Trek 1500 (from trekbikes.com):

Frameset

Sizes: 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 63cm
Frame: Alpha SLR Aluminum
Fork: Bontrager Approved, carbon


Wheels

Wheels: Bontrager Select
Tires: Bontrager Select, 700x25c


Drivetrain

Shifters: Shimano 105 STI, 9 speed
Front Derailleur: Shimano 105
Rear Derailleur: Shimano 105
Crank: Shimano 105 53/39 or 52/42/30
Cassette: Shimano HG50, 12-25, 9 speed
Pedals: Alloy/nylon road w/clips and straps


Components

Saddle: Bontrager Race Basic ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2007/09/trek-1500-review-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cannondale Six13 Pro 2 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cannondale-six13-pro-2-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cannondale-six13-pro-2-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>six13</category>
	<category>six13</category>
	<category>cannondale</category>
	<category>gloss</category>
	<category>ultegra</category>
	<category>fire</category>
	<category>pro</category>
	<category>fsa</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cannondale-six13-pro-2-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cannondale Six13 Pro 2 (or any of the line of Six13&#8242;s for that matter) is a pretty sweet ride.  It&#8217;s like riding under the wings of an eagle; smooth, responsive, and fast. Those are the feelings I got when riding the Six13 Pro 2 on a test ride this past weekend.
The feature list of the components of the Six13 are as follows:

Frame &#8211; Six13 Pro
Fork &#8211; Slice Premium
Rims, Hubs, Spokes &#8211; Mavic Ksyrium Elite
Tires &#8211; Hutchinson Fusion foldable, 700 x 23c
Crank &#8211; Shimano Ultegra, 12-25
Bottom Bracket &#8211; Shimano ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/09/cannondale-six13-pro-2-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Felt F90 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/08/felt-f90-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/08/felt-f90-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bike Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under $700 Bikes]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>felt</category>
	<category>f90</category>
	<category>shimano</category>
	<category>tiagra</category>
	<category>sora</category>
	<category>double</category>
	<category>review</category>
	<category>bike</category>
	<category>road</category>
	<category>carbon</category>
	<category>cheap</category>
	<category>entry</category>
	<category>level</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/08/felt-f90-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Felt F90 is another one of the sub-$700 road bikes that I&#8217;ve been given a chance to test out.  The F90 is Felt&#8217;s least expensive road bike, but fares well when compared to it&#8217;s competition.
Let&#8217;s start with the details and examine them a little further:
Frameset/Fork

Felt F-Lite 7005 double-butted aluminum
Forged dropouts with replaceable hanger
Felt carbon fiber fork

Wheelset

Alex double-wall alloy rims with CNC machined sidewalls
Vittoria Action HSD tires

Components

Felt carbon micro-adjust seatpost
Felt 6061 carbon micro-adjust seatpost
Felt 6061 oversized handlebar with ergonomic drop
Felt ST 3D-forged stem

Drivetrain

Shimano Tiagra/Sora 24-speed shifters and derailleur
FSA/RPM, 3-Piece ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roadcycler.com/2006/08/felt-f90-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
